For Tech Leaders

Tech Leadership Challenge — the quiz for engineers who lead

Test how well you actually know the tech-leadership canon — from Paul Graham essays to the classic engineering-management books to the trade-offs every senior manager eventually hits. Share your score in #engineering-leadership and see who else on your team is reading the same material.

engineering management quiztech leadership triviacto quizengineering manager teststaff engineer knowledge checkpaul graham essay quiztech leader reading list test

Play it first

Tech Leadership Challenge

Jump straight in. AI-hosted, no signup, shareable score at the end.

▶ Play the demo

Built For

Engineering managers, CTOs, tech leads, staff engineers, founder-engineers, engineering-leadership readers

  • +Play the Tech Leadership Challenge in the browser — mobile-first, no signup, 5 minutes
  • +AI host Jasper reads the round with crisp gameshow delivery, not corporate narration
  • +Share your score in Slack #engineering-leadership or on LinkedIn and see who scores higher
  • +Questions pull from Staff Engineer, Making of a Manager, High Output Management, Accelerate, Team Topologies, the PG essay canon, and SRE book
  • +Every fact is cross-checked before the game goes live — no trick questions, no vibes-based scoring

What You Get

  • A shareable score your engineering-leadership peers will actually open
  • A reading-list gut check for senior managers, staff engineers, and CTOs
  • A Slack icebreaker for EM 1:1s, staff-engineer sync meetings, and tech-leadership AMAs
  • A custom round you can build from your own company doc, architecture decision record, or founder post

Suggested starter topic: Engineering management trivia covering books, essays, and industry canon

About This Pack

The Tech Leadership Challenge is built for the population that actually reads Staff Engineer, argues about whether High Output Management has aged well, and has at least one Paul Graham essay bookmarked. It's not an engineering pop quiz — it's a knowledge check across the canon senior engineers and managers are expected to have read. Jasper runs the round like a competent moderator at a founder AMA — crisp, high-signal, no filler — and the pacing respects that the audience doesn't want sound effects, just clean rounds and a clear score.

Questions span the actual reading list senior tech leaders pass around. Staff Engineer archetypes and the path from senior to staff. The Making of a Manager's first-90-days framework and the manager-IC pendulum. High Output Management's managerial leverage and the 1:1 structure. Accelerate's four DORA metrics and the research behind them. Team Topologies' stream-aligned and platform teams. The Paul Graham essays that shaped a generation of founders (Maker's Schedule, Do Things That Don't Scale, Beating the Averages, How to Start a Startup). The Google SRE book's error-budget concept. The practical trade-offs — on-call rotations, performance calibration, RIFs done well versus badly — that don't show up in books but show up in every senior-manager 1:1. The questions aren't trick questions; they're recall for people who've read the material and applied it.

Engineering-leadership channels share work like this exactly the way product-management channels share Lenny's Newsletter: one person plays, the score drops into #engineering-leadership, and the next person has to either match it or admit they haven't read Staff Engineer. The format loops in Slack because the share card previews the pack name and the score. Over the first 90 days at a new company, new staff engineers and EMs use it as the cleanest way to surface the reading-list gap — play the round, see what you got wrong, pick the book off that gap.

Custom rounds are where this gets useful operationally. Paste your team's internal engineering-principles doc and Trivana generates a hosted round keyed to it — run it at the new-EM onboarding, the staff-eng sync, or the tech-all-hands as a replacement for a slide summary. Drop an ADR PDF and get a round that tests whether the team actually read the decision. Drop your founder memo and get a quiz that tests whether the company remembers the strategy shift from last quarter. The pattern is: docs nobody re-reads become rounds everybody plays.

Jasper is the default voice for tech-leadership content because his tone carries the credibility the audience expects. Calm, confident, never breathless — closer to a podcast moderator than a gameshow host. On paid plans, Smart Host voice reactions mean Jasper reacts specifically to each answer, which turns the round into something that feels less like a form and more like a sparring partner who's read the same books.

How To Play + Share

  1. 1. Tap play and take the challenge. No signup, no download.
  2. 2. Share your score — drop the link in the group chat, Stories, or Discord.
  3. 3. Create your own version — any topic, in 30 seconds, with one shareable link.

Related pages

FAQ

Is the Tech Leadership Challenge free to play?

Yes. The free round is 10 questions and takes about 4 minutes. Share the link in any tech-leadership channel and anyone can play without signing up.

What does the quiz cover?

Classic engineering-management references: Staff Engineer (Will Larson), The Making of a Manager (Julie Zhuo), High Output Management (Andy Grove), Accelerate (Forsgren/Humble/Kim), Team Topologies (Skelton/Pais), the Paul Graham essay canon (Maker's Schedule, Do Things That Don't Scale, How to Start a Startup), the Google SRE and DORA material, and the trade-offs every senior manager eventually hits (on-call rotations, staff-engineer archetypes, the manager-IC pendulum, performance calibration, RIFs done well vs badly).

Can I build a custom quiz from my own company docs?

Yes. Paste a Google Doc URL, upload an architecture decision record PDF, or drop in a founder memo, and Trivana generates a hosted round keyed to that material. Staff engineers use this to run ADR reviews as quiz rounds; CTOs use it for onboarding new hires into the engineering-leadership framework.

Will my team need accounts to play?

No. Every teammate opens the link on phone or laptop and plays. The only person who signs up is the manager or staff engineer creating the game.

Is this useful for CTO AMAs and staff-eng sync meetings?

It's built for that — a 5-minute hosted round at the top of a staff-eng sync or CTO AMA wakes the room up faster than a slide deck and gives the meeting a shareable artifact afterward. Managers use it for weekly #engineering-leadership digests, new-hire staff-eng onboarding, and tech-leadership offsite icebreakers.

Build your own version in 30 seconds

Any era, any topic, any language — AI-hosted, shareable, instant.

Create your own game