Synthetic consultative-selling demonstration
Workshop reinforcement · Illustrative cohort
67
round starts
60
round completions
90%
completion rate
78%
average best-attempt match
75
total attempts
8
retakes
4m 8s
average duration
2
response areas flagged
Sequence progression
Each assigned round stays separate.
Completion and best-attempt snapshot
Shared 0–100% scale; every round contains different decisions.
Day 0
Immediate recap
Day 7
Application check
Day 14
Final reinforcement
Starts and completions are assignment-scoped. The same person can appear once in each round; these totals are not a count of verified unique people.
Response-area direction
What may deserve facilitator follow-up.
37 of 60 best-attempt responses matched the buyer-approved answer set.
41 of 60 best-attempt responses matched the buyer-approved answer set.
49 of 60 best-attempt responses matched the buyer-approved answer set.
55 of 60 best-attempt responses matched the buyer-approved answer set.
52 of 60 best-attempt responses matched the buyer-approved answer set.
Suggested facilitator follow-up
Revisit opening discovery and problem framing in the next facilitator touchpoint; they have the lowest answer-match rates in this illustrative sequence.
Directional buyer readout
Three review prompts—not automated conclusions.
Trivana summarizes recorded practice behavior so the buyer can decide what to inspect and where facilitator follow-up may help.
Participation pattern
Round completion stayed between 88% and 91%
Use each round's own start-to-completion rate for follow-up. These assignment totals are not verified attendance or unique-person counts.
Facilitator priority
Opening discovery is the clearest review area
Its 62% buyer-approved answer match is the lowest of five response areas; problem framing is also below the 70% review threshold.
Practice behavior
Eight participant-rounds used one retake
First and best attempts remain separate, so repeated practice is visible instead of being presented as a fresh measurement.
Participant activity excerpt
Participant detail for authorized buyer follow-up.
These labels are synthetic. In a paid cohort, participant names are self-asserted and do not verify identity or attendance.
Sample Participant 01
Day 0 · Immediate recap
- Attempts
- 1 / 3
- First match
- 63%
- Best match
- 63%
Sample Participant 02
Day 0 · Immediate recap
- Attempts
- 2 / 3
- First match
- 57%
- Best match
- 69%
Sample Participant 01
Day 7 · Application check
- Attempts
- 1 / 3
- First match
- 57%
- Best match
- 57%
Sample Participant 02
Day 7 · Application check
- Attempts
- 2 / 3
- First match
- 51%
- Best match
- 63%
Sample Participant 01
Day 14 · Final reinforcement
- Attempts
- 1 / 3
- First match
- 66%
- Best match
- 66%
Sample Participant 02
Day 14 · Final reinforcement
- Attempts
- 2 / 3
- First match
- 60%
- Best match
- 72%
What each download contains
Share the report or analyze the underlying rows.
The sample CSV contains all 67 synthetic participant-round rows. The sample PDF consolidates the summary, graphs, review prompts, and participant activity.
CSV structure preview
Illustrative excerpt
Sequence progression
Day,Reinforcement round,Cohort,Delivery status,Unique starts,Unique completions,Total attempts,Completion rate,Average best-attempt score,Average best-attempt duration (seconds)
Day 0,Immediate recap,Illustrative August cohort,Closed,24,21,27,88%,78%,246
Day 7,Application check,Illustrative August cohort,Closed,22,20,25,91%,74%,264
Day 14,Final reinforcement,Illustrative August cohort,Closed,21,19,23,90%,81%,232
Competency,Responses,Correct,Accuracy,Follow-up flag
Opening discovery,60,37,62%,Review
Problem framing,60,41,68%,Review
Evidence selection,60,49,82%,
Objection navigation,60,55,92%,
Next-step alignment,60,52,87%,